An Analysis of Jordan Peele's Works from a Big Fan
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Jordan Peele has been of my favorite creators of film for a long time. I have been a fan of his dating back to the beginning of his skit-show Key and Peele. The fandom has continued with his development of great horror movies, with Get Out being the best of them in my mind. But what's really interesting, especially with the idea of Peele as an Auteur in mind, is how different these two projects are for Peele. First, Key and Peele is a comedy-skit show, which stars Peele as an actor and writer, and is largely a lighthearted (but well thought out) show full of jokes. Meanwhile, Get Out is a serious horror movie, containing deep themes of race and our justice system, as well as being a well-written and enjoyable scary film. On the surface, it seems the two could be made by two totally different people, but there are actually many similarities upon a deeper look.
Probably the most obvious comparison between the two is Peele's inclusion in each of race and issues with racism in our society even today. Key and Peele takes a more lighthearted approach, often making jokes about racist scenarios and situations within our society. Here is an example of one of the popular skits in the show that tackles racism is a fun and lighthearted way:
Meanwhile, Get Out approaches the same topics in a much more serious manner. The racism in the movie's scenario develops into full blown kidnapping and murder, and the family in the movie is quite literally evil and horrifying. Of particular note though, is the alternate ending of the movie. It shows how Peele's original intention was probably to hit the audience hard, and cause them to feel disturbed by a harsh reality of racism that exists still within the American justice system. In the end, after fighting for his life, Chris is arrested for his "crimes" and is sentenced to jail, which can be seen in the clip here:
While the tone difference between the two pieces of film is interesting, it is clear that Peele puts a similar stamp on each piece, with his inclusions of racial topics being most apparent. I think it shows an important aspect of cinema, which is that the same message can be presented in two totally different ways, yet still have an equally similar effect. In one piece Peele jokes about racism, in another he horrifies, but in the end he accomplishes his goal of getting the audience to talk and think about racism and how it occurs in our daily lives. I think the idea that a message like this one can be presented in totally different ways is a very exciting thing, and proves how cinema is such a wonderful and creative platform to express messages and ideas about our everyday lives.
In the movie that my group made for the fascination project, I was one of the actors in the mini film. It was an interesting and fun experience, and it actually took more thought and planning than I was expecting it to. Furthermore, after reading the chapter on acting in Moving Pictures , it's fascinating to see how many solidified acting strategies that me and my group actually used. First of all, one thing that my group definitely had was limited time for rehearsals. We really had to just plan our scenes on the fly and do the best we could in the moment to act out the scene a way that best fit the ideas in our heads. In reading the textbook, it's really fascinating to see that's common practice in cinema as a whole, and that figuring out how to act out a scene very quickly is something that's necessary to succeed as an actor. It's also fascinating how my group used the method of blocking without even knowing it was a thing. We just naturally pla...
In the reading for the week on narrative, I came across the concept of an anti-hero. Basically, it is a form of a protagonist who is not necessarily morally perfect. They have questionable motives and often are complex characters, yet they're still presented as the main character of the story. I think this is such an effective element for a story to have, and personally I love any sort of cinema that has an anti-hero. I think it leads to just more complex characters and therefore more complex plot and themes. One show in particular that I think has used this very effectively recently is House of the Dragon. The show focuses heavily on a King named Viserys, who seems to mean well, but also makes questionable decisions and doesn't always do the right thing. There is also heavy focus on a character named Daemon. Daemon is criticized by many people in the show and he definitely can be described as hostile and maybe immature. Y...
Do you ever have a moment where you see a person's name listed on your favorite movie, and you go online to look into who this person is, and you come to find out they've been involved in many movies and shows that you love? This is what happened with me when looking up film producer McG. Going through his IMDB page, I enjoy so many movies and shows he's worked on, such as The Babysitter, Love Hard, Holidate, The DUFF, The O.C., and Chuck. Now there is something all these pieces have in common: they are made to be very approachable. They are mostly comedy driven movies that are meant to be taken lightly and purely enjoyed. For example, look at The DUFF. It's a movie that is meant to be a playful and lighthearted story of a teen girl going through insecurities about her appearance and popularity. Here is a scene in particular that really shows the movie's lightheartedness and willingness to have fun with its creativity: The film...
Comments
Post a Comment